In this case, the Supreme Court of India has invalidated Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The provision, which penalized the dissemination of information causing annoyance, inconvenience, or insult, was found to be unconstitutionally vague and overly broad. The petitioners contended that Section 66A’s protections exceeded the permissible restrictions on freedom of speech under Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution. The Court concurred, stating that the provision’s undefined terms could unjustly curtail a significant amount of protected speech.
Blog
-
Netflix Summoned by the MIB Over Controversial IC-814 Series
-
DOT releases Draft Rules under Telecommunications Act, 2023
-
MEITY to release draft DPDP rules for public consultation after Budget session
-
Impact of Broadcasting Bill, 2024 on Digital Communications and Media
-
A licence raj for digital content creators
News
-
Netflix Summoned by the MIB Over Controversial IC-814 Series
-
DOT releases Draft Rules under Telecommunications Act, 2023
-
MEITY to release draft DPDP rules for public consultation after Budget session
-
ET : Final Draft of the DPDP, Rules to be ready in two weeks
-
Nigeria FCCPC fines Meta $220 million for violating data laws